The Death Experience

IS DEATH AN ILLUSION?

We live in a world where almost everything is according to perception. We see, believe and perceive according to our development consciously. This allows for everyone to have different views and opinions. One thing is certain, our state of consciousness determines our reality, and until you have evolved to a certain height (spiritually), you will not be able to understand that “we” create our own reality. This means many things and it asks many questions, one of such question is, what is real?.

If we create our reality (which we do), then is anything real? For instance is the sky really blue or white people really white? Is there such a thing as illness, or is this coming from somewhere deep within for an individual who is going though an illness, have they created their own suffering? If we are able to create our reality, then we are more than just mere humans, we are more than who we think we are, but then what are we? Is it possible to have this discussion with everyone? The answer to this is no, because everyone is not on the same level to discuss possibilities which will be considered out of the norm, and the norm being what they have been taught. The human mind has limitations, but this also has been taught to us. Actually, the human mind is limitless, boundless and more. So much to know, so much to teach, so much to share.

 

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/biocentrism/201111/is-death-illusion-evidence-suggests-death-isn-t-the-end

Is Death an Illusion? Evidence Suggests Death Isn’t the End

Life is an adventure that transcends our ordinary linear way of thinking.
After the death of his old friend, Albert Einstein said “Now Besso has departed from this strange world a little ahead of me. That means nothing. People like us … know that the distinction between past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.”

New evidence continues to suggest that Einstein was right, death is an illusion.

Our classical way of thinking is based on the belief that the world has an objective observer-independent existence. But a long list of experiments shows just the opposite. We think life is just the activity of carbon and an admixture of molecules: we live awhile and then rot into the ground.

We believe in death because we’ve been taught we die. Also, of course, because we associate ourselves with our body and we know bodies die. End of story. Butbiocentrism, a new theory of everything, tells us death may not be the terminal event we think. Amazingly, if you add life and consciousness to the equation, you can explain some of the biggest puzzles of science. For instance, it becomes clear why space and time—and even the properties of matter itself—depend on the observer. It also becomes clear why the laws, forces, and constants of the universe appear to be exquisitely fine-tuned for the existence of life.

Until we recognize the universe in our heads, attempts to understand reality will remain a road to nowhere.

Consider the weather ‘outside’: You see a blue sky, but the cells in your brain could be changed so the sky looks green or red. In fact, with a little genetic engineering we could probably make everything that is red vibrate or make a noise, or even make you want to have sex, as it does with some birds. You think its bright out, but your brain circuits could be changed so it looks dark out. You think it feels hot and humid, but to a tropical frog it would feel cold and dry. This logic applies to virtually everything. Bottom line: What you see could not be present without your consciousness.

In truth, you can’t see anything through the bone that surrounds your brain. Your eyes are not portals to the world. Everything you see and experience right now‚ even your body, is a whirl of information occurring in your mind. According to biocentrism, space and time aren’t the hard, cold objects we think. Wave your hand through the air—if you take everything away, what’s left? Nothing. The same thing applies for time. Space and time are simply the tools for putting everything together.

Consider the famous two-slit experiment. When scientists watch a particle pass through two slits in a barrier, the particle behaves like a bullet and goes through one slit or the other. But if you don’t watch, it acts like a wave and can go through both slits at the same time. So how can a particle change its behavior depending on whether you watch it or not? The answer is simple, reality is a process that involves your consciousness.

Or consider Heisenberg’s famous uncertainty principle. If there is really a world out there with particles just bouncing around, then we should be able to measure all their properties. But you can’t. For instance, a particle’s exact location and momentum can’t be known at the same time. So why should it matter to a particle what you decide to measure? And how can pairs of entangled particles be instantaneously connected on opposite sides of the galaxy as if space and time don’t exist? Again, the answer is simple: because they’re not just ‘out there’—space and time are simply tools of our mind.

Death doesn’t exist in a timeless, spaceless world. Immortality doesn’t mean a perpetual existence in time, but resides outside of time altogether.

Our linear way of thinking about time is also inconsistent with another series of recent experiments. In 2002, scientists showed that particles of light “photons” knew, in advance,what their distant twins would do in the future. They tested the communication between pairs of photons. They let one photon finish its journey—it had to decide whether to be either a wave or a particle. Researchers stretched the distance the other photon took to reach its own detector. However, they could add a scrambler to prevent it from collapsing into a particle. Somehow, the first particle knew what the researcher was going to do before it happened, and across distances instantaneously as if there were no space or time between them. They decide not to become particles before their twin even encounters the scrambler. It doesn’t matter how we set up the experiment. Our mind and its knowledge is the only thing that determines how they behave. Experiments consistently confirm these observer-dependent effects.

Bizarre? Consider another experiment that was recently published in the prestigious scientific journal Science (Jacques et al, 315, 966, 2007). Scientists in France shot photons into an apparatus, and showed that what they did could retroactively change something that had already happened in the past. As the photons passed a fork in the apparatus, they had to decide whether to behave like particles or waves when they hit a beam splitter. Later on – well after the photons passed the fork – the experimenter could randomly switch a second beam splitter on and off. It turns out that what the observer decided at that point, determined what the particle actually did at the fork in the past. At that moment, the experimenter chose his past.

Of course, we live in the same world. But critics claim this behavior is limited to the microscopic world. But this ‘two-world’ view (that is, one set of physical laws for small objects, and another for the rest of the universe including us) has no basis in reason and is being challenged in laboratories around the world. A couple years ago, researchers published a paper in Nature (Jost et al, 459, 683, 2009) showing that quantum behavior extends into the everyday realm. Pairs of vibrating ions were coaxed to entangle so their physical properties remained bound together when separated by large distances (“spooky action at a distance,” as Einstein put it). Other experiments with huge molecules called ‘Buckyballs’ also show that quantum reality extends beyond the microscopic world. And in 2005, KHC03 crystals exhibited entanglement ridges one-half inch high, quantum behavior nudging into the ordinary world of human-scale objects.

We generally reject the multiple universes of Star Trek as fiction, but it turns out there is more than a morsel of scientific truth to this popular genre. One well-known aspect of quantum physics is that observations can’t be predicted absolutely. Instead, there is a range of possible observations each with a different probability. One mainstream explanation, the “many-worlds” interpretation, states that each of these possible observations corresponds to a different universe (the ‘multiverse’). There are an infinite number of universes and everything that could possibly happen occurs in some universe. Death does not exist in any real sense in these scenarios. All possible universes exist simultaneously, regardless of what happens in any of them.

Life is an adventure that transcends our ordinary linear way of thinking. When we die, we do so not in the random billiard-ball-matrix but in the inescapable-life-matrix. Life has a non-linear dimensionality; it’s like a perennial flower that returns to bloom in the multiverse.

“The influences of the senses,” said Ralph Waldo Emerson “has in most men overpowered the mind to the degree that the walls of space and time have come to look solid, real and insurmountable; and to speak with levity of these limits in the world is the sign of insanity.”

 

Tags

Obara Meji

Obara Meji is a spiritualist, Ifa-Orisa practitioner, and teacher of metaphysics. Since 2011 she has used her online platform to share her personal experiences to those seeking answers about spirituality. Her teachings will expand into short stories, novels, and public speaking to continue her mission of bringing enlightenment to the world.

8
Leave a Comment

avatar
7 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
LincolnlisaObara MejiNunu Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify me of
Lincoln
Member
Lincoln

Agree Lisa

Lisa
Blogger
Lisa

In this world we are limited to what we can accept as reality and the norm, so we take comfort in the mundane, our thought process is that we are alone in the universe , and when we die that is it!!!.. I know that couldn’t be right , life is too completed to be that simple. We are not alone, how could we be when we ourselves are been of the universe. Ok so to think this way to the simple “Programmed Human” is insanity, this is just self preservation, because of fear, We are all one with the universe, and like rain, once we fall, aka die, we just evaporate and come back as rain again, with other steps in-between of course.

We are not alone..

Lincoln
Member
Lincoln

Nunu I read that a couple days ago on Yahoo

Nunu
Blogger
Nunu

There was a video out a couple days ago that showed what appeared to be a ‘city’ floating around above the clouds in China and there was another sighting in a village in Africa.According to the villagers they saw skyscrapers and roads and even heard sounds coming from the “city”.Some people said it could be a natural phonema refracted light etc. that cause an illusion called a “super mirage” while others said it could be a parallel universe and of course some thought hoax/govt secret project. As they say anything is possible.

Lincoln
Member
Lincoln

Very interesting but not our of my realm of thinking- I actually believe in multiverse and the multi version of reality happening simultaneously. Many scifi writers and shows as the twilight zone have dealt with this. Issue is just like your writing states most are just offered up as theory.
I often have premonitions and deep feelings of familiarity with places or situations (I guess in this universe or dimension) I have just experiencing but I am sure I have been there or experienced this situation before- I think these are examples of multiverse or multi dimensions but what do I know
I will leave those deep matter to folks like you OM – till I am more knowledgeable

Blessed Love All

p.s OM could you hit me up on the nightmares for the baby – Would really appreciate it

lisa
Blogger
lisa

DeJa Vu dat Lincoln, dat is the obvious proof that we exist in multi universes..

Back to top button
Close